The long-running battle
between the Bases Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA) and Camp John Hay
Development Corp which is also known as Camp John Hay in Baguio, led by
businessman Robert John Sobrepeña as he
fights on and, from the looks of it, is nowhere near its end.
At stake is the control
and possession of the 247-hectare section inside the former US military
recreational facility in Baguio known as Camp John Hay. Sobrepeña’s group won
the bid to develop the property in the 1990s, but stopped paying lease rentals
to the government since 1998.
According to BCDA, the
arrears of the Sobrepeña group have since ballooned to P3.4 billion (25 percent
of which is supposed to go to the city government of Baguio).
To make a long story
short, Sobrepeña—who is more popular for his forays into real estate (via
Fil-Estate) and MRT says his CJH Development firm is not making enough money to
pay rent to BCDA. The BCDA, meanwhile, thinks CJH is understating its earnings
just to dodge payments. In any case, BCDA wants Sobrepeña out of John Hay,
while the latter is holding on to it tight.
All this problems will further prolong the city’s wait for the
payment of its uncollected share from the lease rental. BCDA and CJHdevCo’s
botched negotiations for the payment of the rentals placed at f P3.024 billion
resulted to the developer’s filing for the rescission of its Restructuring
Memorandum of Agreement with BCDA signed in 2008 for BCDA’s alleged failure to
deliver contractual obligations and demands.
CJhDevCo has filed a petition for arbitration before the courts to mediate the issues. CJHDevCo also sued for protection against BCDA’s takeover and succeeded with the issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order by the Regional Trial Court.
Chief Executive Officer Arnel. Casanova debunked CJHDevCo’s move saying it was baseless as there was no attempt to take over the leased properties. “As far as the BCDA is concerned, there is no legal basis for a TRO which makes him look like he is misguided.
The city stands to receive 25 percent of the CJHDevCo arrears
with the BCDA based on the lease agreement.The original agreement pegged
the lease rental at P425 million annually for the first five years starting in
1996 and P150 million annually thereafter and the city’s share from the rental
was supposed to be 25 percent or P106 million for the first five years and
P35,500,000 for the succeeding years.
However, the lease agreement was restructured in
2000, 2003 and in 2008. How can
CJHDevco be remiss in its rentals and other MOA commitments to the government
when it has already remitted P1.5 billion in rentals to the BCDA, created 2,000
jobs and invested P5 billion in the development of the erstwhile military camp?
The issue could have not gone out of hand if only the parties
sat down and exercised diplomacy to understand each other instead of resorting
to court cases .
No comments:
Post a Comment